The Holy Scriptures and The Koran

The book The Holy Scriptures vs the Holy Koran is a detailed analysis of the greatest piece of universally accepted "hate literature" that has ever been put in print, at least where it deals with "religion." It is the greatest proof available, today, that every major news media source in Europe and America (CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, BBC, National and International Public Radio, Time, Der Spiegel, Life, Newsweek, 500 daily newspapers in America, etc.), which professes to be concerned with "hate speech" and "hate literature," is just flatuent rhetoric coming from inflated gas bags who are trying to "make points" with sex perverts, women, blacks, and Roman Catholics. All are hypocritical opportunists using political expedients to "fit in" with the world system.

Anyone who has collected magazines and newspaper clippings, since 1980, on the "situation in the Middle East," will see quickly that "hate speech" and "hate literature," that lead to actual terrorism and war with all of its appendages, does not apply to ANY enemy of Israel. In Palestine, where more than 2,000,000 non-Palestinians have entered (as "refugees") since 1948, children are not just taught how to hate Jews, they are instructed on how to get to Paradise by killing them. The instruction takes place in "summer camps," and the photos reveal children under twelve­years-old handling grenades, bombs, and automatic weapons.

While Milosevic (Serbia) was being arrested and tried as a "war criminal" for "crimes against humanity" by the so-called "Global Community," Yassar Arafat was leading five terrorist groups (the Al Fatah, the Hamas, the Hizbullah, the PLO, and the Fedayeen), from 1960 to 2001, in slaughter tactics-not just "hate speech" and "hate literature" (see Israel: A Deadly Piece of Dirt, 2001, pp. 373-412). I have the clippings: three briefcases full.

The world view (or "mind set") now has been thoroughly established by the news media; it is characterized by the usual double standards that accompany any criminal operation. In Biblical revisions, this is the king sin of the Alexandrian Cult. In dealing with Catholic States (South Ireland, Croatia, Cuba, etc.), this is Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) at the Vatican. In dealing with blacks in the USA, this is SOP in all courts of law-especially District Judge's "courts." In religion, the double standard is used by Mormons (Joe Smith added to Scriptures to correct it); Catholic traditions are used to correct the Scriptures; the Talmud is for Jews to correct the Scriptures; "historic positions" are used by Protestants to correct the Scriptures; and so forth and so on.

In the UN, a Jew, who defends himself against five Muslim nations attacking him (1948), is a "Nazi" or a "child killer." In 1967, when it happened again, the Jew was an "agressor" and a "warmonger." He is now a "child killer." Each Muslim child under eighteen, who gets killed while involved in the Intifada (Arafat's attempt to take over Palestine) getting the front page (in bold face print), every time, as a helpless, innocent martyr; the poor, weeping, bereaved parents are shown if possible. Anyone who collected clippings on the Croatia- Serbia- Kosovo mess is well prepared for any of the 500 American "dailies" that are now coming out. For two years (1999 and 2000) they did nothing but print the photos of the poor, "oppressed" Catholic Croatians and the poor, persecuted, "suffering Muslims" (in Kosovo). Not one time, between 1998 and 2001, did you see the bombed-out Serbian homes, churches, factories, and hospitals, or one "poor, persecuted," mistreated Greek Orthodox Serbian "getting it in the neck." All photographers, for all news media outlets, had instruction on what to photograph and what NOT to photograph.

This is SOP with all news items that deal with Londonderry in Ulster, all news items connected with "the West Bank," all news items that deal with a pope "visiting" some country, and all items that promote a "united Irish Republic," Mother Teresa, and any "radical" conflicts or any "newsy" story of crimes committed by sex perverts.

The world mind-set NOW is (and has been since 1964) totally anti-Jewish ("racist"). The UN and the USA (consciously or unconsciously-the results are the same) have been supporting a Muslim agenda of genocide, as clearly stated, as clearly announced, as clearly defined, and as clearly being carried out as any program revealed at the Nazi Wannassee Conference in 1942 by Heinrich Himmler. The present "Palestinian Agency" and "Palestinian Authority" are nothing but carbon copies of the Hitler Youth Movement in Germany (1933-1939). They match it to the letter.

How is it that the perennial and eternal truth of history - "The only thing men learn from history is that men never learn from history" - is still as applicable in the twenty-first century as it was in the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries? Didn't any "modern man" progress an inch beyond 1500? Evidently not.

Barak's dealing with Arafat, Sharon's dealing with Arafat, and Perez's dealings with Arafat (1964-2000) match Prime Minister Chamberlain's dealings with Adolph Hitler to the "T" (Last letter in a Hebrew alphabet: "Tau"): continual sell-outs and continual compromises with a bloody killer, under threat of WAR if the demands are not met. Both situations are identical; both are rooted and grounded in RACISM: "anti­Semitism."

No one in the UN or the USA pays anymore attention to history than blind Bartimaeus on a weekend drunk.

The UN, while claiming to be a "Global Community" as a "Family (!!!) of Nations," has simply been so busy with the life-long occupation of all American and European politicians that it hasn't had time to open a history book and read it. The lifetime occupation of all politicians in Europe and America is simply to stay in office: get rid of anyone or anything that might prevent them from staying "in the driver's seat." The UN only has one real goal; it is not to stop "hate literature" or genocide. Their global goal is the goal of every pope since Leo I: how to protect themselves so they can get control of all the nations on which they can get their hands. Again, this charge is not connected with ANY "allegations." It is in print and has been for years.


The Political Structure of the European Union
(2, 6, p. 3ff).
(December, 2000, via the Treaty of Nice)

I. The president of the EU will appoint twenty "commissioners" (in Soviet Russia these are called "commissars": 1920-1945). All twenty are bureaucrats. NONE OF THEM ARE ELECTED. They, therefore, do not really represent ANY nation; they represent whoever controls the president.

II. All future laws passed by the UN are to be "initiated" by these twenty bureaucrats; they are not accountable to ANY government-not even the ones from which they are chosen. The "initiatives" include
foreign policy, POLICING (Korea, 1950: "not a war but a POLICE action"), and criminal matters (i.e., arrest Milosevic and leave Gerry Adams and Yassar Arafat "at large" to kill Protestants and Jews). Now, this is not just the "tip of the you-know­what." It is just a little foam on the beer vat. You see, this bureaucrat setup, coming from Catholic Belgium, Catholic Germany, Catholic Austria, Catholic Spain, Catholic France, Catholic Italy, Catholic Portugal and Yugoslavia - if the pope can finish the bankruptcy of the Serbians - desires to create an International ARMY of 60,000 SWAT team killers under the guise of "peace keeping forces"
.
III. They are to have the "backing" of 1,000 "policemen" who will be supported by lawyers and judges. The reporter in this political structure notes that it is to originate in Brussels, Belgium, where the huge computer called "The Beast" is located. (See any literature on the matter reported in more than 100 "newsletters" from religious organizations since 1960.)

IV. The UN-called by native idiots of various news outlets, "The greatest hope for peace that man­kind has ever known"-has stated that if any political party, in any country, objects to the laws and "established rules" that are going to be set up by the "Centre" of the European Parliament, they are to be host to "the peace keeping forces" of the UN, from 1920­1945 called "the Center Party" in Germany. It was solidly Roman Catholic, and it was "dissolved" by Von Papen and the Pope in order to give Hitler the required number of votes to become Chancellor (see any history of Germany). The "Centre"of the EU is fifty sinners. Not ONE of them was elected by any nation in the UN or the EU, and they are accountable to no one for their functions as a MILITARY DICTATORSHIP on a world-wide scale. The "greatest hope you have for peace" has already demonstrated its sincerity and effectiveness since World War II: eighty-eight wars in less than forty-five years.

V. Under the European Convention on Human Rights (!!), a European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) was established (2, 6 p. 4ff, 27). In it the judges can "strike down" the legislation of any nation in the UN, where those people have passed the laws for their own country. (FDR, 1933, Civil Rights Acts 1964: District Court judges in charge of the "laws" of states in which they don't even live.) But who reads history in the EU, the EEC, or the UN?  NOBODY!

Now all world government will be by APARTHEID, for the 1966 ECHR gave any individual in Europe the right to overthrow the laws of his own city, county, duchy, diocese, parish, state, territory, etc., by "petitioning" the ECHR. In America, this was the 13th and 14th Amendment to the Constitution (1865-1866), commonly known as "CANCER" IN THE CONSTITUTION." (See any conservative historian on the subject.)

No leader in the UN or the EU or the EEC studies history.

Never forgetting that the Pope is the political head of a STATE and that he deals in geopolitics (see the work by Malachi Martin called The Keys of This Blood, 1990), you can see why Slovodon Milosevic was tried as a "war criminal" by Catholics in the UN after four popes (Pope Pius XII, Pope Paul VI, Pope John XXIII, and Pope John Paul II) prevented all news media outlets from publishing the war crimes against "humanity" committed by their own church members (Bishop Stepinac and Pavelich) while torturing and murdering 250,000 Serbian Orthodox church members in 1942.

Archbishop Stepinac was in charge of murdering more than 100 times the number with which Milosevic was charged. (See any documented work by the English historian Avro Manhattan.) History is not a strong suit with anyone after World War 11. Stepinac was safe as a Catholic; Arafat is safe as a Muslim.

Double standard: one for "Ulster EXTREMISTS" and one for Muslim killers.

One standard for Serbian Greek Orthodox church members; another one for the Vatican's flunkies. Double standard in order to stay in power; that is the EU, the EEC, the USA, and the UN.

Racism, religious discrimination, and GENOCIDE, backed up by Mary and Muhammad, the Pope and Arafat, the Vatican, and the Kaaba, the Catholics and the Muslims, plus an army of professional killers (see above) to enforce the double standard.

In Afghanistan, the federal laws state that if any man born into a Muslim family defects from the Church­State religion (Islam), he is to be killed by the government officials (i.e., "The Justice Department" in America). The Muslim States who do not have this law "on the books" still practise it just the same. That is, according to the last fifteen native Muslims to whom I have spoken in my church office since 1990.

This does not mean that the UN will take any action against any Muslim country that kills "anti­Muhammadan" defectors. You see, history shows that the Supreme Court in America will never interfere with a local law in a state as long as it is in line with the news media's position on what is right and what is wrong. The Supreme Court ("the law of the land" and all that jazz) only intervenes and takes action where the rights of a pornographer, race-mixer, sex pervert, women's "libber," atheist, humanist, evolutionst, or criminal are involved.

So the UN welcomes racist killers who practise religious discrimination. But! Not if they are from Ulster, Ireland! But! Not if they are Serbians killing Catholics! But - you see a double standard allows for all kinds of "goodies" - but not if they are from Waco, Texas or Ruby Ridge, Idaho!

If they are Muslims who "wet backed" their way across Jordan onto the "West Bank" so you would think they were Palestinian "refugees" (2,000,000 of them!), then they can be racist killers, and the UN will support them. You see, they are not killing Catholics or Muslims: THEY ARE KILLING JEWS.

In this work, you will discover the foundation or basis upon which genocide is to be carried out. You can see why all Muslims can glorify assassinations, thievery, lying, imprisonments, arrests, murder, and even torture and mutilation. The basis is RELIGIOUS, not political. The five Muslim terrorist groups we men­tioned simply need a political setup so they can produce a legitimate ARMY - a government supported "peace-keeping force" in order to establish killing as a legitimate function of a UN "global family of nations."

The goal of Arafat's phony "Palestinians" is not just to drive Jews out of Palestine. All of Arafat's forebearers and ancestors in Egypt, Morrocco, Syria, Lebanon, Assyria, Iraq, Iran, Persia, Turkey, Arabia, and "Trans-Jordan" were engaged in driving Jews out of every Muslim country on earth through a period of 400 years. Imagine a Jewish "community" in Mecca, Medina, Amman, or Babylon! What then, pray tell, is any Muslim "community" doing in Jerusalem or Hebron?

Double standard.

If you check all the references in this work, you will arrive at the conclusion that, eventually, the UN will have to choose between what one book says about Israel and what the other book says about Israel. One Book will be what Paul called "the holy scriptures" (Rom. 1:2), and the other will be what Arafat called "The Holy Koran" (Qur'an).

The Muslims who swear by the Koran have stated thirteen times (see Israel: A Deadly Piece of Dirt, 2001) that their goal has nothing to do with peace with anyone, in any form. Their goal is to kill every Jew in Palestine if he doesn't get out of it. The Muslim "plan" for the authors of the other book (the Holy Bible) - all of them were JEWS (Rom. 3:2), as well as their "king" (Matt. 27:37; John 4:22) - runs totally contrary to EVERY statement ever issued by the UN where it dealt with anyone's "rights" - national, international, individual, religious, intellectual, economic, or racial. The charter of the UN, in 1950, would condemn every move that any killer in the Hamas, Al Fatah, Intifada, PLO, Hizbullah, or Fedayeen has made since 1929. Not one of them, or the men that led them, was ever summoned to a UN "court" to give an account for anything. Slobodan Milosevic was "summoned." The Pope summoned him.

No Muslim "peace plan" has anything to do with anything but Mafia blackmail. If the demands are not met (at "Camp David" or Oslo or Wye, etc.), then the Israelites are to be butchered. It is that simple. Every "summit" was a lying fraud because every Muslim there was operating according to what his "Holy" Book taught him. His "Holy" Book taught that slavery, concubinage, torture, mutilation, murder, and thievery were perfectly proper in dealing with Islam's enemies "in the way of Allah." We do not say that without lengthy documentation (pp. 50, 67, 81, 108).

The alibi for murdering unarmed Jewish civilians right and left for more than sixty years - it started in 1921 and 1929 - and literally "getting away with it," was a religious alibi. It was their "religious convictions." That was the identical alibi used by the Roman Catholic Church from A.D. 500-A.D. 1890 for mass murders, including the Crusades (1100-1200).

But newspaper readers and TV viewers never read history books.

All Church-States believe in killing anyone who ridicules their faiths or even critizes them. All Church­States are basically totalitarian ("imperialistic") systems that have designs on real estate and "assets" - not the conversion of sinners (see James 4:1-4 and pp. 227-240 in Israel: A Deadly Piece of Dirt, 2001).

This material shows you the inner workings of the minds of the advocates of an imperialistic religion, which they swear will dominate the entire earth (see pp. 86, 130) in total contradiction and defiance of 500 verses of another "Holy" Book which says Israel will wind up in the "driver's seat" (Isa. 2).

The Holy Koran is NOT "hate literature" according to 188 Bible-rejecting nations in the UN in downtown New York. It is just a record of someone's "religious faith." This stance is taken with the assurance that no news media outlet in America will dare check the contents of the Koran and report it. If they do they will not take it seriously, but if they do take it seriously, they will still defend it on the grounds of "we should all be tolerant of the faiths of others," etc. I'm sure you know the "line." It is taught in every federal school in the USSA (United Search and Seizure of Assets).

But in this case, you have a truly unique situation; for this time, it is not just someone's belief about God, holy rituals, life after death, Yin and Yang, prayer, etc. It is seven nations - every one of them a Church-State (Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Afghanistan, Trans­Jordan, and Syria) - backed by the news media so they can kill, lie, steal, murder, break treaties, bomb civilians, and destroy property in order to get REAL ESTATE. And this time the largest, most apostate, degenerate group of professing Christians the world has ever seen is backing them up: the Roman Catholic Vatican State.

You see, when it comes to killing Jews (Acts 4:27), Herod and Pilate (Luke 23:12) could get together. So when it comes to killing Jews, "Mary" and "Muhammad" get along like "seven in a bed" (American: circa 1890).

The UN would call that paragraph "hate speech." They would do it while supporting Catholic and Muslim terrorism. Double standard.

Just settle down and read for a while, and don't believe one word I am about to write until you have checked every cotton pickin' reference in this book; especially the excerpts taken from the Koran. And never, never, never (no never!) forget that no matter what I think about Catholics, Muslims, the Koran, Arabs, or Islam, I would never be so rotten and wicked and demon-possesed as to kill or hurt anyone who made fun of MY religion or my faith or my God or my Saviour or my Holy Bible. That is the ethical sature of Catholics and Muslims, not "Christians. "

Anyone who has as much access to the truth as I do (John 17:17, 6:63, 14:6) never gets "in a huff" just because some blind, religious bigot or Catholic extremist fanatic slanders his faith or his religion or his Bible or his God or the man himself. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" (Jer. 23:28) is our reponse to verbal attacks.

Our Book can take care of itself and any Catholic or Muslim in any century on any continent. When you find some dirty, low-down, sneak-thief dog, who is so weak and unstable (and unsure of what the truth is) that the dirty, cowardly assassin would want you killed in order to shut your mouth, you are not dealing with a "devout Muslim"; you are dealing with an ignorant, paranoid BUTCHER.

That is what every "Palestinian" in Israel is doing who is engaged in trying to drive Israel out of a piece of land of which God said it is "my land" and said that it was "promised" to "my people," because "my holy hill" is in it (Psa. 2:6) where I intend to set "my king" (Psa. 2:6) to reign over all Arabs, Muslims, Catholics, Palestinians, Europeans, Americans, and anyone else who is left alive after I slaughter 200,000,000 "peace keeping forces" (Rev. 9:16) on "my land" (Ezek. 38:3­9).



Every real, genuine Muslim in Islam believes that:
1. Ham and Ishmael produced God's "chosen people" to replace the Jew and be a "standard bearer" of the truth to every American, European, Asiatic, and African on this planet (p. 131).

2. John the Baptist, Abraham, David, and Moses were not just "pure," but like Jesus Christ, they were sinless (pp. 39, 68). The statement is that all of God's "messengers" are sinless, so that would include Muhammad, a fornicating epileptic with fourteen wives, who claimed Jesus Christ never died for anyone nor was He resurrected.

3. No sinner can get forgiveness for an intentional murder, as no atonement is available for any sinner: blood does not atone for sins.

4. Jesus Christ was an ordinary human being born according to "the natural laws" of nature, and He did
not die on a cross (p. 54).

5. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John all LIED about Christ's resurrection, and so did Paul (Rom. 1:4) and Peter (1 Pet. 1:3, 3:18).

6. The angel Gabriel lied to Mary about Christ's conception (pp. 16-18), and he lied again about Zecha­riah doubting his announcement (Luke 1:20). Luke simply lied when he wrote down Luke 1:20.

7. God is all through with Israel permanently. The Arabians replaced Israel as God's "people." (The term in both Testaments - Hosea 4:8, 12; Rom. 11:1 - is a reference to the twelve sons of Jacob.)

8. It is perfectly proper to mutilate and kill anyone who is a "disbeliever" if they "attack" you first; the word, in application, means anyone who criticizes Islam, Allah, Muhammad, or the Koran. Further, anyone who helps the Jews (see Gen. 12:1-4) deserves to be killed "in the way of Allah" (p. 62).

9. In spite of the fact that in the Koran "Allah" promised to give Palestine to the Jews (p. 102), it now belongs to 3,000,000 Muslim "refugees," more than 2,000,000 of whom never were "refugees, " were not born or raised in Palestine; and never got into the West Bank until AFTER 1950 (see Israel: A Deadly Piece of Dirt, 2001, p. 357).

10. Hell is not real "`fire" (but it is! see p. 153) it is just a metaphor for your mother (but it is literal! see p. 155). Heaven is handmade for males with a dozen virgins with which each male to fornicate - plus the wives that get there with him (see p. 75), although he is only allowed four wives plus the virgins. Muhammad, being a fleshpot and a hog, got fourteen wives plus the "girlies."

11. If you die in combat while killing Jews or Christians, you are a martyr and get a free passport to heaven, even if you didn't earn it by your works.

12. Jeremiah lied about the restoration of Israel (Jer. 30-33). Ezekiel lied about the restoration of Israel (Ezek. 40-48). Isaiah lied about the restoration of Israel (Isa. 65-66). Amos lied about the restoration of Israel (Amos 9). Joel lied about the restoration of Israel (Joel 3). Hosea lied about the restoration of Israel (Hosea 2-3). Paul lied about the restoration of Israel (Rom. 11). Daniel lied about the restoration of Israel (Dan. 2, 7, 12). And Moses lied about the restoration of Israel (Deut. 32:43).

That is, to be a good "Muslim" you must reject the witness of eight Bible prophets, any one of whom made more than TEN TIMES the prophecies that Muhammad made. Still you must accept him in their stead, although the poor fool couldn't make one historical prophecy on a single historical event that would take place after his death.

13. Anyone who doesn't take Muhammad's word against eight Biblical writers who were "moved by the Holy Ghost" when they prophesied, is "UNJUST" (p. 72).

14. Muhammad was the third member of the Holy Trinity - the Holy Ghost himself! This last piece of radical insanity came from claiming there was no Trinity; no "Godhead" (Rom. 1:20). So Muhammad gave himself two attributes of Deity: 1. He was sinless (see No. 2). 2. He was the "Comforter" who was sent to dwell inside the body of the believer and "seal him" to "the day of redemption" (cf. Eph. 4:30 and John 14:16). If that wasn't enough monkey shines for one monkey, it turns out that Muhammad baptizes each believer into Jesus Christ (see Gal. 3:27 and l Cor. 12:13). The "Comforter" is said to be the "Holy Ghost" in all three chapters that identify Him (John 14, 15, 16).


Now! Turn to the Suras and READ the paragraphs that deal with that matter (see p. 61) and read the Islamic scholars' comments on the Suras. All Mus­lims believe that the "Holy Ghost" of John 14, 15, 16 was Muhammad.

Here then is the UN's "Stalingrad" (or Waterloo, or whatever): a book. A book written by an illiterate, fornicating, epileptic polygamist and propagated for four centuries by bloodshed. It is accepted by the UN as acceptable "religious literature" because some moron put the word "Holy" on it: The Holy Koran (Qur'an). To the morons in the UN, this makes the book equal to "the HOLY scriptures" (Rom. 1:2), which are "the scripture of truth" (Dan. 10:21); the Catholic idea being that if some inflated, bloated, egotistical, fat-headed, religious fakir thinks something is "holy" or believes it is holy, THAT MAKES IT "HOLY."

For example, in "the holy scriptures" (New Testament), no church organization is "holy," no church council is "holy," and Mary is not "holy." There is no such things as "holy water" or "holy sacraments" or a "Holy See," and the only "Holy Father" in the New Testament is God the Father who begat Jesus Christ. The early New Testament Christians say nothing about holy crosses, holy cinctures, holy novenas, holy monks, holy nuns, holy beads, holy rosaries, holy candles, or holy "encyclicals." All of that man-made garbage is just man-made garbage. That is what religious politicians use as an alibi to protect their own religious organizations. The "Vatican" is no more "holy" than downtown Las Vegas or Chinatown in Manila.

In the New Testament, the "brethren" in Christ are holy (Heb. 3:1), the Scriptures are holy (Rom. 1:2), Jesus is called God's "holy child" (Acts 4:27), a group of angels are called "holy" (Luke 9:26), all believers make up a "holy priesthood" (1 Pet. 2:5), and Christians greet one another with a "holy kiss" (1 Cor. 16:20). The Old Testament "holy place" is mentioned in Matthew 24:15, and "the Holiest of all" (in the Tabernacle) is found in Hebrews 9:3. New Jerusalem is only said to be a "holy city" AFTER the Church Age is ended (Rev. 21:2, 10). Even after the Church has gone, Jerusalem is likened to "Sodom and Egypt" (Rev. 11:8) until Christ lands on the Mount of Olives (Zech. 14).

At no time do Mecca or Rome ever "win, place, or show" when it comes to anything "holy." They are just about as "holy" as the Ganges River, Mount Fujiyame, Lourdes, downtown San Francisco, Cairo, Manila, or Hong Kong.

In the New Testament, Mary is no more "holy" than Martha or Mary, and a Pope would be nor more "holy" than Demas or Thomas. Holy mosques and holy Korans and holy feasts and holy "messengers" (the Koran) don't exist. They are blanks. Your body is "the temple of the HOLY Ghost," and He sure is not some ragheaded philosopher trying to work his way into Paradise as the thieves and robbers do in John 10:1-8.


The finished Koran - which was dictated by one man in collusion with himself - identifies Palestine as the Promised Land given to the twelve tribes of Jacob (pp. 101-102), which means that now SIX Arab nations, backed by the USA and the Vatican, are supporting a "holy war" against the Koran; a "Jihad" against Allah! Muhammad claimed that the Suras were given to him by Allah!

Thus, twenty-first century man has finally reached the apex of his intellectual prowess: bananas gone bonkers. A "holy war" against the book that claimed if you were against it, Hell was your destination. A "holy war" by a race who professed to believe the book! They are out to prove their own prophet (Muhammad) and their god (Allah) were both liars, along with Gabriel, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Amos, Isaiah, Peter, Paul, Jude, Ezekiel, Daniel, and Jeremiah!

International insanity. You are in it. It is not "on the way"; it is here - Laodicea; read `em and weep. The Bible and the Koran are so divided against each other, so separated, segregated, and isolated from each other as to source, wisdom, revelation, honesty, intent, and result that no computer or man with an IQ of 300 could successfully integrate them as two religions where "each should recognize the truth that is in the other, etc.

Thev cannot be reconciled. Opinions to the contrary are either from uninformed fools who never even checked the texts or else from heady, highminded "think tanks" who have been worshipping their own brains for so long they think "with them all things are possible." They are not. The Bible and the Koran are more violently in contrast and at odds with one another than the theologies of Bertrand Russell and Billy Sunday.

The UN, by force of Exxon and the oil companies, will have to pretend the two books are compatible, or at least we should be "open minded." The UN will do this while following the Vatican into the valley of Armaggedon (Rev. 14; Joel 3) with the USA and the EEC as "fellow travelers" on their way to an anti­Semitic, anti-Biblical, anti-intellectual, bloody SUICIDE (Zech. 10-14).


Return to church main page
Return to religions page